Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Lenexa Manufacturing Company LLC has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, CORNETT, ROBERT D, within 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus indicates that the company's current prosecution activity is concentrated on a specific technical application.
CORNETT, ROBERT D serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the only examiner currently handling a pending matter for the company, CORNETT, ROBERT D manages the entire active workload. This relationship is central to the company's current efforts within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action allows for a streamlined communication process. Practitioners can dedicate their attention to this single examiner to resolve the pending action efficiently within the specialized field of mechanical engineering.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORNETT, ROBERT D | 1 | 39.2% | +44.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18825238 | LOCK NUT BLADE ASSEMBLY | CORNETT, ROBERT D | 8d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18825238 | LOCK NUT BLADE ASSEMBLY | CORNETT, ROBERT D | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3724 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18825238 | LOCK NUT BLADE ASSEMBLY | CORNETT, ROBERT D | 3724 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Sep 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial