Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lenoss Medical Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single active matter is assigned to examiner SIPP, AMY R., who is also designated as the company's busiest examiner. The presence of only 1 pending office action indicates a highly focused or early-stage prosecution effort for the company.
The portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, which matches the number of distinct examiners involved. SIPP, AMY R. is responsible for 1 pending office action, representing the entirety of the company's current active docket. This 1:1 ratio between the examiner and the total pending actions means that the company's immediate success in this technology area depends on a single individual's review.
Practitioners should note that with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, there is no internal baseline for comparison within the company's current USPTO activity. The strategy for the 1 pending office action must be tailored specifically to the historical patterns of SIPP, AMY R. and the specific practices of the assigned art unit. This centralized prosecution profile simplifies docket management but increases reliance on a single examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIPP, AMY R. | 1 | 71.1% | +26.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19054386 | STABILIZING AND FUSING JOINTS | SIPP, AMY R. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19054386 | STABILIZING AND FUSING JOINTS | SIPP, AMY R. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3775 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19054386 | STABILIZING AND FUSING JOINTS | SIPP, AMY R. | 3775 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 14, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLenoss Medical Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Amy R. Sipp has the most, with 1 of Lenoss Medical Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
