Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lentigen Technology Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed in 1 distinct art unit. Such a streamlined prosecution profile indicates a specific approach to its current patent filings. The examiner identified for this action is PAK, MICHAEL D, who is currently managing 1 pending office action for the company. Because this is the only active matter, the outcome of this 1 pending office action will be the primary indicator of the company's success in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.
With 1 pending office action, the active portfolio rests with PAK, MICHAEL D. This examiner's past behavior and specific expertise will be the critical factors for the applicant to consider. The use of 1 distinct art unit narrows the procedural context, providing a specific set of administrative rules to follow. Practitioners should focus on the feedback from this 1 distinct examiner, as their individual perspective will determine the success of the company's current patent efforts. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the prosecution remains within a specialized administrative framework. This focused strategy allows for a concentrated effort on a single technical matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAK, MICHAEL D | 1 | 58.3% | +30.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18408907 | Chimeric Antigen Receptors and Methods of Use | PAK, MICHAEL D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18408907 | Chimeric Antigen Receptors and Methods of Use | PAK, MICHAEL D | 1674 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial