Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
LG H&H Co. Ltd. has 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 4 actions are handled by 4 distinct examiners across 4 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio indicates a completely fragmented prosecution landscape for the current workload. WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Since each of the 4 pending actions is assigned to a different examiner, the workload is evenly split.
The involvement of 4 distinct art units for only 4 actions suggests that each application falls into a different technical sub-specialty. Practitioners must manage 4 separate relationships with 4 different examiners. There is no opportunity to leverage experience with a single examiner or art unit across multiple pending cases in this small portfolio. The prosecution strategy for these 4 pending office actions must be entirely individualized, as the standards and preferences of 4 different examiners and 4 different art units will apply. This level of dispersion for a small portfolio requires careful attention to the specific nuances of each separate matter. Practitioners should focus on the unique requirements of each examiner and unit to ensure favorable results for all 4 pending actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (33%) |
| §102 only | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 1 | 13.3% | +66.7% |
| SARCENO ROBLES, CHRISTIAN MANUEL | 1 | 50.0% | +100.0% |
| PURDY, KYLE A | 1 | 41.0% | +35.7% |
| ETZEL, ALAN RAYMOND | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | 1 | 55.5% | +46.4% |
| ATKINSON, JOSHUA ALEXANDER | 1 | 51.8% | +27.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19394624 | REPLACEABLE FLOSS DEVICE | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | — |
| 18881193 | DISPENSER AND DISPENSING DEVICE COMPRISING CONTAINER | ETZEL, ALAN RAYMOND | — |
| 18860504 | COMPOSITION FOR DYEING HAIR | TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19394624 | REPLACEABLE FLOSS DEVICE | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | — |
| 19111785 | SKIN CARE DEVICE | SARCENO ROBLES, CHRISTIAN MANUEL | — |
| 19099176 | ORAL CARE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PREPARING ORAL CARE COMPOSITION | PURDY, KYLE A | — |
| 18860504 | COMPOSITION FOR DYEING HAIR | TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | — |
| 18723232 | OIL-IN-WATER TYPE D-PHASE EMULSION COMPOSITION WITH EXCELLENT EMULSION STABILITY | ATKINSON, JOSHUA ALEXANDER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 1 |
| 3794 | 1 |
| 1611 | 1 |
| 3754 | 1 |
| 1615 | 1 |
| 1612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19394624 | REPLACEABLE FLOSS DEVICE | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 3772 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2025 |
| 19111785 | SKIN CARE DEVICE | SARCENO ROBLES, CHRISTIAN MANUEL | 3794 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 13, 2025 |
| 19099176 | ORAL CARE COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PREPARING ORAL CARE COMPOSITION | PURDY, KYLE A | 1611 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 28, 2025 |
| 18881193 | DISPENSER AND DISPENSING DEVICE COMPRISING CONTAINER | ETZEL, ALAN RAYMOND | 3754 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 03, 2025 |
| 18860504 | COMPOSITION FOR DYEING HAIR | TCHERKASSKAYA, OLGA V | 1615 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 25, 2024 |
| 18723232 | OIL-IN-WATER TYPE D-PHASE EMULSION COMPOSITION WITH EXCELLENT EMULSION STABILITY | ATKINSON, JOSHUA ALEXANDER | 1612 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLG H&H Co. Ltd. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 6 examiners.
Adriena Jonique Webb Lyttle has the most, with 1 of LG H&H Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
