Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Lifebridge Technologies LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Lifebridge Technologies LLC is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which indicates a high level of concentration in the review process. Furthermore, these actions are both located within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the company's current active filings are focused on a specific technical classification.

The busiest examiner for the company is BAYS, PAMELA M, who is overseeing 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. This means that BAYS, PAMELA M is responsible for the entirety of the 2 pending office actions in the company's current portfolio. Because all prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's success in this technology area is closely tied to the relationship with this single official. Practitioners can focus their efforts on understanding the specific examination patterns of BAYS, PAMELA M. This streamlined prosecution environment allows for a consistent and targeted legal strategy for the active applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BAYS, PAMELA M 2 71.8% +37.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19339227 Minimally Invasive Heart Pump for Assisting Systolic and Diastolic Pump Function with Modular Adjustable Strain Construct Insertion BAYS, PAMELA M —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19067788 Material Characteristics Ideal for Providing Either Partial or Total Mechanical Support to the Failing or Arrested Heart and Method for Developing Ideal Characteristics for Underlying Cardiac Disorders BAYS, PAMELA M 19d
19339227 Minimally Invasive Heart Pump for Assisting Systolic and Diastolic Pump Function with Modular Adjustable Strain Construct Insertion BAYS, PAMELA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19339227 Minimally Invasive Heart Pump for Assisting Systolic and Diastolic Pump Function with Modular Adjustable Strain Construct Insertion BAYS, PAMELA M 3796 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2025
19067788 Material Characteristics Ideal for Providing Either Partial or Total Mechanical Support to the Failing or Arrested Heart and Method for Developing Ideal Characteristics for Underlying Cardiac Disorders BAYS, PAMELA M 3796 §112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Feb 28, 2025

Managing Lifebridge Technologies LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Lifebridge Technologies LLC have?

Lifebridge Technologies LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Lifebridge Technologies LLC applications?

Pamela M Bays has the most, with 2 of Lifebridge Technologies LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Lifebridge Technologies LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month