Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lifemotion Medical Technology Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, representing a very concentrated prosecution profile. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which may indicate that the application is in a preliminary phase of the patent office's workflow.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES, who is handling the 1 pending office action. This individual is the only examiner with an active matter for the company. Because the entire workload is centered on WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES, his specific examination tendencies will be the primary driver of the company's immediate patent outcomes.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | 1 | 58.8% | +60.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18968935 | DIVERTER FOR MEMBRANE OXYGENATION DEVICE | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18968935 | DIVERTER FOR MEMBRANE OXYGENATION DEVICE | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18968935 | DIVERTER FOR MEMBRANE OXYGENATION DEVICE | WRUBLESKI, MATTHEW JAMES | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial