Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Liftra Ip Aps has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 2 pending office actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. Despite the multiple examiners, all activity is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. WILENSKY, MOSHE K is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents part of the 2 pending office actions for the company. The other action is with the second of the 2 distinct examiners.
The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a consistent technical theme for the applications. Liftra Ip Aps must manage the different perspectives of 2 distinct examiners while adhering to the specific standards of that single art unit. Having 2 pending office actions in 1 distinct art unit allows the company to develop a deep understanding of that unit's specific examination standards. However, the involvement of 2 distinct examiners means that the company cannot rely on a single relationship for its entire portfolio. Practitioners should compare the feedback from WILENSKY, MOSHE K with that of the other examiner to identify any common themes or discrepancies within the 1 distinct art unit. This focused approach within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector helps in maintaining consistency across the 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILENSKY, MOSHE K | 1 | 75.4% | +15.8% |
| VU, STEPHEN A | 1 | 82.1% | +14.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19019884 | METHOD AND YOKE FOR LIFTING A WIND TURBINE COMPONENT | WILENSKY, MOSHE K | — |
| 18830085 | MAIN SHAFT FIXTURE | VU, STEPHEN A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19019884 | METHOD AND YOKE FOR LIFTING A WIND TURBINE COMPONENT | WILENSKY, MOSHE K | 3725 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 14, 2025 |
| 18830085 | MAIN SHAFT FIXTURE | VU, STEPHEN A | — | Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLiftra Ip Aps has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Moshe K Wilensky has the most, with 1 of Liftra Ip Aps's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
