Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Lightray Innovation GmbH currently manages 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This matter is handled by a portfolio-wide distribution of 1 distinct examiner across 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of work suggests a highly focused prosecution strategy where all active matters are consolidated under a specific point of review. For practitioners, this means that the entire pending portfolio is subject to the specific interpretive lens of a technical group within the USPTO, which may lead to high consistency in prosecution outcomes.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This represents the total of the company's current pending office actions. Practitioners should note that the examiner's workload for this specific applicant is limited to this case, which may allow for more direct engagement during the response phase. Because the portfolio involves only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the applicant's immediate success in the Communications area depends entirely on resolving the specific concerns raised by PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M. This centralized structure simplifies the management of deadlines and examiner interviews compared to portfolios spread across multiple units.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | 1 | 77.0% | +12.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18820817 | MOBILE DEVICE BASED LIGHT DIFFUSER FOR RADIATION MEASUREMENTS | PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18820817 | MOBILE DEVICE BASED LIGHT DIFFUSER FOR RADIATION MEASUREMENTS | PASIEWICZ, DANIEL M | 2699 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial