Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Lightvision Corp. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 pending matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This singular focus suggests a very specific technical focus for the company's current patent filings. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's active prosecution efforts in the transportation and mechanical fields. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is presently unified under a single point of review, which may lead to consistent feedback for this specific application.
The busiest examiner for the company is SIMPSON, DIONE N, who handles 1 pending office action. This represents the total pending workload for the company. The involvement of only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the company's current prosecution success depends on this single matter. Success in this 1 pending office action, overseen by SIMPSON, DIONE N, is the primary goal of the company's immediate intellectual property strategy within the 1 distinct art unit involved. This concentrated environment requires a precise legal approach tailored to the standards of this individual examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIMPSON, DIONE N | 1 | 32.6% | +32.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19187779 | METHOD OF PROVIDING A PARKING SYSTEM USING QR CODE BASED ON ACCURATE RECOGNITION OF LICENSE PLATE | SIMPSON, DIONE N | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19187779 | METHOD OF PROVIDING A PARKING SYSTEM USING QR CODE BASED ON ACCURATE RECOGNITION OF LICENSE PLATE | SIMPSON, DIONE N | 3d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19187779 | METHOD OF PROVIDING A PARKING SYSTEM USING QR CODE BASED ON ACCURATE RECOGNITION OF LICENSE PLATE | SIMPSON, DIONE N | 3628 | §101 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Apr 23, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial