Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Line Lion LLC maintains a company patent portfolio that currently shows a minimal level of prosecution activity. The data indicates 1 pending office action, which is the only active matter for the company at this time. This 1 pending office action suggests a focused intellectual property strategy, likely centered on a single key innovation.
The prosecution of this portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner, but the data shows 0 distinct art units. This suggests that while 1 examiner has been assigned to the case, the formal art unit categorization is not currently available in the data. Despite the 0 distinct art units, the involvement of only 1 distinct examiner points to a centralized and narrow prosecution process for the company.
ENGLISH, PETER C is the busiest examiner for Line Lion LLC, currently handling 1 pending office action. As the only 1 examiner associated with the portfolio, English's individual review and decision-making will be the sole factor in the outcome of the pending application. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the company's current patent office engagement is entirely focused on this 1 interaction, allowing for a targeted legal approach.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENGLISH, PETER C | 1 | 32.8% | +27.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19050880 | Golf Putting Training Tool | ENGLISH, PETER C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19050880 | Golf Putting Training Tool | ENGLISH, PETER C | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19050880 | Golf Putting Training Tool | ENGLISH, PETER C | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial