Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lithium Harvest Aps

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Lithium Harvest Aps maintains a concentrated patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The current prosecution landscape for this company is defined by 1 pending office action. This single matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the company's immediate legal strategy is focused on a narrow point of contact within the patent office.

The portfolio is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit. ADAM ADRIEN GERMAIN is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner's pending count of 1 accounts for the total pending office actions for the company, the outcome of this specific interaction will determine the immediate success of the portfolio's current filings.

For a practitioner, this data suggests a streamlined prosecution environment. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, there is no internal variance in how the patent office is treating these Chemistry & Materials applications. The focus remains entirely on the specific requirements and preferences of ADAM ADRIEN GERMAIN.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1 33.3% +4.9%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1777 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17956228 Water Processing Method and Unit GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1777 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Sep 29, 2022

Managing Lithium Harvest Aps's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month