Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Logika Systems Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is located within 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a specific technical focus for the company's current intellectual property. The concentration in 1 art unit suggests that the pending matter is subject to a particular set of examination guidelines and technical classifications.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES. As the busiest examiner for the portfolio, HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES is responsible for 1 pending office action. This creates a 1 to 1 relationship between the examiner and the company's pending workload, simplifying the communication process between the applicant and the USPTO.
Practitioners should note that with 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the current prosecution strategy is very centralized. This centralization within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector allows for a focused response to USPTO inquiries. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit further streamlines the technical requirements for the pending application, as all current feedback comes from HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18615112 | SINGLE RADAR STRIP CENTERING SYSTEM | HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18615112 | SINGLE RADAR STRIP CENTERING SYSTEM | HALLORAN, THOMAS JAMES | 3648 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Mar 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial