Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Loop Commerce Inc.

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

6
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (6)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only4 (57%)
§103 only1 (14%)
§102 only1 (14%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
86% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE 1 55.7% +38.7%
MISIASZEK, MICHAEL 1 55.9% +15.0%
PEARSON, DAVID J 1 78.1% +11.5%
WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 1 39.6% +41.8%
ANSARI, AZAM A 1 47.6% +49.6%
GIBSON-WYNN, KENNEDY ANNA 1 50.6% +40.4%
CIRNU, ALEXANDRU 1 43.2% +21.0%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312039 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY DEFINABLE GIFT OBJECTS GIBSON-WYNN, KENNEDY ANNA 85d overdue
18607670 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OBJECT-BASED USER RECOGNITION ANSARI, AZAM A 74d overdue
18051541 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING GIFT SELECTION, ATTRIBUTION, AND DISTRIBUTION CIRNU, ALEXANDRU 30d overdue
18624234 DYNAMIC MODIFICATION OF DIGITAL REDEMPTION TRANSACTIONS WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 28d

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18312039 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY DEFINABLE GIFT OBJECTS GIBSON-WYNN, KENNEDY ANNA 85d overdue
18607670 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OBJECT-BASED USER RECOGNITION ANSARI, AZAM A 74d overdue
18828687 FLEXIBLE LINKED OBJECT SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE 51d overdue
18634329 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC DATA PACKAGE TRANSMISSION ON A DIGITAL LEDGER PEARSON, DAVID J 45d overdue
18769832 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ENABLING GIFTING OF A GIFT PRODUCT ON A LEGACY MERCHANT STORE FRONT MISIASZEK, MICHAEL 43d overdue
18051541 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING GIFT SELECTION, ATTRIBUTION, AND DISTRIBUTION CIRNU, ALEXANDRU 30d overdue
18624234 DYNAMIC MODIFICATION OF DIGITAL REDEMPTION TRANSACTIONS WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 28d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3688 2
3622 2
3689 1
2407 1
3621 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18828687 FLEXIBLE LINKED OBJECT SYSTEM USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES KRINGEN, MICHELLE THERESE 3689 §103 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Sep 09, 2024
18769832 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ENABLING GIFTING OF A GIFT PRODUCT ON A LEGACY MERCHANT STORE FRONT MISIASZEK, MICHAEL 3688 Other Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Jul 11, 2024
18634329 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC DATA PACKAGE TRANSMISSION ON A DIGITAL LEDGER PEARSON, DAVID J 2407 §102 Non-Final OA 45d overdue Pending Apr 12, 2024
18624234 DYNAMIC MODIFICATION OF DIGITAL REDEMPTION TRANSACTIONS WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 3622 §101 Final Rejection 28d Pending Apr 02, 2024
18607670 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OBJECT-BASED USER RECOGNITION ANSARI, AZAM A 3621 §101 Final Rejection 74d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2024
18312039 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY DEFINABLE GIFT OBJECTS GIBSON-WYNN, KENNEDY ANNA 3688 §101 Final Rejection 85d overdue Pending May 04, 2023
18051541 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING GIFT SELECTION, ATTRIBUTION, AND DISTRIBUTION CIRNU, ALEXANDRU 3622 §101 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Nov 01, 2022

Managing Loop Commerce Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month