Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Love Random Life is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action. The company's prosecution is currently managed by 1 distinct examiner. This work is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical classification for the pending matter. The alignment of one examiner and 1 distinct art unit suggests a straightforward prosecution path without the complexity of multi-unit coordination.
EMILY M MORGAN is the busiest examiner for the company, currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure accounts for the total 1 pending office action in the portfolio. For the practitioner, this means that the current prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the feedback and requirements of this single examiner within the mechanical systems field. The concentration of the active matter with a single examiner allows for a direct dialogue, though it also means the company's immediate patent success is tied to a single individual's interpretation.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORGAN, EMILY M | 1 | 35.5% | +33.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650555 | MULTI-PURPOSE JEWELRY WITH VARIABLE APPEARANCE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18650555 | MULTI-PURPOSE JEWELRY WITH VARIABLE APPEARANCE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18650555 | MULTI-PURPOSE JEWELRY WITH VARIABLE APPEARANCE | MORGAN, EMILY M | 3677 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Apr 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial