Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lumana Inc. operates a patent portfolio within the Networking & Security technology area. The company currently has 2 pending office actions, which are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. This indicates that each of the company's active matters is undergoing an independent review process at the patent office. The split across different examiners suggests a varied approach to the company's intellectual property assets.
The prosecution is occurring across 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's technology involves different specialized aspects of the Networking & Security field. GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the 2 pending office actions are handled by different examiners in different art units, the company must manage two separate prosecution tracks. For a practitioner, this means that the legal strategies and technical arguments used for one action may not be directly applicable to the other. The current data reflects a diversified prosecution environment where no single examiner or art unit dominates the company's active workload, requiring a tailored approach for each filing.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI | 1 | 40.9% | +9.7% |
| GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18452719 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR DISTRIBUTED CLOUD VIRTUAL MEMORY | GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI | 14d |
| 18145301 | HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING ARCHITECTURE FOR VISUAL CONTENT PROCESSING AND USES THEREOF | GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2400 | 1 |
| 2100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18452719 | SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR DISTRIBUTED CLOUD VIRTUAL MEMORY | GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI | 2400 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Aug 21, 2023 |
| 18145301 | HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING ARCHITECTURE FOR VISUAL CONTENT PROCESSING AND USES THEREOF | GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE | 2100 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial