Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, yet they are concentrated within 2 distinct art units, suggesting some overlap in the technical classification of the applications. This arrangement indicates that while the technical field is somewhat narrow, the office has assigned multiple reviewers to the company's current filings.

The busiest examiner, CHOI, ALICIA M, is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there are 3 distinct examiners for the 3 pending office actions, the workload is perfectly distributed across the individuals assigned to this portfolio. For a practitioner, this means that every active matter requires a unique relationship with a different examiner, even when 2 distinct art units are involved.

The focus within the Computing & Software technology area suggests a specialized portfolio, but the use of 3 distinct examiners introduces multiple subjective review styles. Since CHOI, ALICIA M only oversees 1 busiest examiner pending office action, there is no central figure to influence the majority of the prosecution. Practitioners must therefore tailor their arguments to three different perspectives while maintaining consistency across the two technical units involved in the 3 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
67% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHOI, ALICIA M 1 79.5% +28.2%
POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ 1 76.5% +32.2%
CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 1 41.9% +35.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18942812 DEVICE PROCESSING METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CHOI, ALICIA M —
18920955 DEVICE CONTROL METHOD POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18942812 DEVICE PROCESSING METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CHOI, ALICIA M —
18920955 DEVICE CONTROL METHOD POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ —
18728465 DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2115 1
2171 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18942812 DEVICE PROCESSING METHOD, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM CHOI, ALICIA M — §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
18920955 DEVICE CONTROL METHOD POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ 2115 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 20, 2024
18728465 DEVICE CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 2171 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024

Managing Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd. have?

Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd. applications?

Alicia M Choi has the most, with 1 of Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Lumi United Technology Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month