Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Luminx Il Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, BROWN JR, HOWARD D, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, which defines the current technical focus.
With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the portfolio's current prosecution is concentrated under 1 examiner interaction. This 1 distinct examiner handles the only pending matter, meaning the prosecution strategy is centralized. Such a structure allows for a direct relationship with BROWN JR, HOWARD D but also ties the portfolio's success to the interpretation of 1 individual within the 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of 1 pending office action suggests that the company is not currently managing a high volume of diverse technical claims. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the 1 distinct examiner, as BROWN JR, HOWARD D handles the entirety of the company's pending workload. This 1 to 1 ratio between actions and examiners simplifies the management of the portfolio but limits the variety of examiner feedback available in the Networking & Security area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 1 | 88.0% | +6.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19067734 | INTRAORAL SCANNER | BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2488 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19067734 | INTRAORAL SCANNER | BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 2488 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Feb 28, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLuminx Il Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Howard D Brown Jr. has the most, with 1 of Luminx Il Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
