Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Luminx Il Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating that every active matter is being reviewed in a different technical group by a different person. This represents a highly decentralized prosecution landscape for the company.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is SHAHNAMI, AMIR, who is handling 1 pending office action. This represents one of the 3 total pending actions currently active for the company. With 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units for only 3 actions, every single matter is being handled by a different person in a different technical group. The 1 pending office action assigned to SHAHNAMI, AMIR is the only one for that examiner.
Practitioners must manage 3 distinct examiner relationships across 3 distinct art units, which requires a versatile strategy. Each of the 3 pending office actions is subject to the specific standards of a different Networking & Security art unit. The outcome of the company's current prosecution will be determined by these three separate and independent interactions at the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHAHNAMI, AMIR | 1 | 82.0% | +9.8% |
| BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 1 | 87.9% | +6.9% |
| FATIMA, UROOJ | 1 | 75.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19067734 | INTRAORAL SCANNER | BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 9d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19069185 | PROPERTIES MEASUREMENT DEVICE | SHAHNAMI, AMIR | 39d |
| 18377720 | DENTAL DEVICE WITH PROBE | FATIMA, UROOJ | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2483 | 1 |
| 2488 | 1 |
| 2676 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19069185 | PROPERTIES MEASUREMENT DEVICE | SHAHNAMI, AMIR | 2483 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 39d | Pending | Mar 03, 2025 |
| 19067734 | INTRAORAL SCANNER | BROWN JR, HOWARD D | 2488 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Feb 28, 2025 |
| 18377720 | DENTAL DEVICE WITH PROBE | FATIMA, UROOJ | 2676 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial