Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A is managing 4 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. All 4 of these cases are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a very specific and consistent technical focus for the company's mechanical filings. The prosecution involves 4 distinct examiners, which means that while the art unit is the same, the individual reviewers are all different. This consistency in art unit assignment may allow for some strategic overlap in technical arguments.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is NGUYEN, JIMMY T, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. This reflects the even distribution of the 4 pending office actions among the 4 distinct examiners. For practitioners, the concentration in 1 distinct art unit is a key factor, even though they must navigate the individual preferences of 4 different examiners for the 4 active matters. Success depends on understanding the specific culture of the single art unit while tailoring arguments to each official.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, JIMMY T 1 76.4% +23.6%
TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L 1 50.8% +56.0%
SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 1 78.5% +17.1%
TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS 1 78.0% +16.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18847913 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR STRAIGHTENING A METAL WIRE NGUYEN, JIMMY T —
18834527 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO COLLECT PRODUCTS, IN PARTICULAR METAL PRODUCTS, FROM A WORK MACHINE TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18030406 DRAWING UNIT AND CORRESPONDING METHOD FOR METAL PRODUCTS TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS 156d overdue
18847913 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR STRAIGHTENING A METAL WIRE NGUYEN, JIMMY T —
18834527 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO COLLECT PRODUCTS, IN PARTICULAR METAL PRODUCTS, FROM A WORK MACHINE TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L —
18717265 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR BENDING OBLONG METAL PRODUCTS SULLIVAN, DEBRA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18847913 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR STRAIGHTENING A METAL WIRE NGUYEN, JIMMY T 3725 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 19, 2025
18834527 APPARATUS AND METHOD TO COLLECT PRODUCTS, IN PARTICULAR METAL PRODUCTS, FROM A WORK MACHINE TEMPLETON, CHRISTOPHER L 3725 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 30, 2024
18717265 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR BENDING OBLONG METAL PRODUCTS SULLIVAN, DEBRA M 3725 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 06, 2024
18030406 DRAWING UNIT AND CORRESPONDING METHOD FOR METAL PRODUCTS TOLAN, EDWARD THOMAS 3725 §103 Final Rejection 156d overdue Pending Apr 05, 2023

Managing M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A have?

M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A applications?

Jimmy T Nguyen has the most, with 1 of M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A's pending office actions.

What technology area are M E P Macchine Elettroniche Piegatrici S P A's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month