Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
M-League Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working in 1 distinct art unit. The focused nature of this portfolio suggests a highly specific prosecution track for the company's current intellectual property assets.
LANEAU, RONALD is identified as the busiest examiner for this company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of the company's current workload. The concentration of work under a single examiner and art unit indicates a narrow technical scope for the company's current patent activities. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication process given that the portfolio is handled by 1 distinct examiner.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit further confirms that the company's recent filings are concentrated in a specific technological niche. With 1 pending office action to address, the immediate prosecution workload is minimal. This data reflects a portfolio in a stable or early stage of development within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LANEAU, RONALD | 1 | 88.2% | +9.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18597000 | Computer Implemented System and Method for Collecting, Trading, and Crafting Non-Fungible Digital Tokens, and Playing Fantasy Game Using Said Non-Fungible Digital Tokens | LANEAU, RONALD | 35d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18597000 | Computer Implemented System and Method for Collecting, Trading, and Crafting Non-Fungible Digital Tokens, and Playing Fantasy Game Using Said Non-Fungible Digital Tokens | LANEAU, RONALD | 3715 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 35d overdue | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial