Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

M37 Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

M37 Inc. has 1 pending office action in Communications. The matter is assigned to 1 examiner and 1 art unit.

BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M is the assigned examiner. Counsel can focus on a single prosecution record and tailor the response to the applicable communications examination practice.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M 1 82.6% +16.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18884833 MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING OR INFERRING USER ACTION AND INTENT BASED ON SCREEN IMAGE ANALYSIS BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18884833 MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING OR INFERRING USER ACTION AND INTENT BASED ON SCREEN IMAGE ANALYSIS BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18884833 MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING OR INFERRING USER ACTION AND INTENT BASED ON SCREEN IMAGE ANALYSIS BRANDT, CHRISTOPHER M 2645 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2024

Managing M37 Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does M37 Inc. have?

M37 Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most M37 Inc. applications?

Christopher M Brandt has the most, with 1 of M37 Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are M37 Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month