Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Macrodyne Technologies Inc. is currently navigating 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is located within 1 distinct art unit and is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This represents a focused prosecution effort where the company's current patent activity is centralized in one technical area. Such a profile is common for companies focusing on a specific mechanical innovation or medical instrument.
The busiest examiner, ORTIZ-ORTIZ, ALONDRA MICHELLE, is handling the 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's current experience at the USPTO is highly specific. The outcome of this 1 pending office action will be the primary indicator of the portfolio's current progress in the medical device sector. Practitioners should focus on the specific examiner's history and the standards of the 1 distinct art unit to navigate the prosecution. The concentration of the 1 pending office action under a single reviewer means that all current intellectual property efforts are directed through this one channel.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORTIZ-ORTIZ, ALONDRA MICHELLE | 1 | 25.0% | +100.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698185 | SUPERSONIC FLUIDIC OSCILLATOR AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A SUPERPLASTIC FORMING PROCESS | ORTIZ-ORTIZ, ALONDRA MICHELLE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698185 | SUPERSONIC FLUIDIC OSCILLATOR AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A SUPERPLASTIC FORMING PROCESS | ORTIZ-ORTIZ, ALONDRA MICHELLE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18698185 | SUPERSONIC FLUIDIC OSCILLATOR AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING A SUPERPLASTIC FORMING PROCESS | ORTIZ-ORTIZ, ALONDRA MICHELLE | 3725 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 03, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMacrodyne Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Alondra Michelle Ortiz-Ortiz has the most, with 1 of Macrodyne Technologies Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
