Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Macrogenics Inc.

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
3
Unknown (75%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
No statute on record3 (75%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE 1 63.7% +39.7%
BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1 64.4% +19.7%
DUFFY, BRADLEY 1 54.4% +45.4%
LUNDE, GRACE HENRY 1 63.6% +37.5%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18320599 TRI-SPECIFIC BINDING MOLECULES THAT SPECIFICALLY BIND TO MULTIPLE CANCER ANTIGENS BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE 23d overdue
18164952 Covalent Diabodies and Uses Thereof DUFFY, BRADLEY 23d
18178783 COMPOUND TARGETING IL-23A AND TNF-ALPHA AND USES THEREOF BUNNER, BRIDGET E 28d
17787793 Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer LUNDE, GRACE HENRY 34d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1643 2
1647 1
1641 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18320599 TRI-SPECIFIC BINDING MOLECULES THAT SPECIFICALLY BIND TO MULTIPLE CANCER ANTIGENS BRISTOL, LYNN ANNE 1643 Other Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending May 19, 2023
18178783 COMPOUND TARGETING IL-23A AND TNF-ALPHA AND USES THEREOF BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1647 Other Non-Final OA 28d Pending Mar 06, 2023
18164952 Covalent Diabodies and Uses Thereof DUFFY, BRADLEY 1643 §103 Non-Final OA 23d Pending Feb 06, 2023
17787793 Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer LUNDE, GRACE HENRY 1641 Other Final Rejection 34d Pending Jun 21, 2022

Managing Macrogenics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month