Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Madorra Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This variety suggests that the company's technology spans multiple specialized review groups within the patent office. The distribution of cases across different units may lead to varying timelines and examination styles for the pending applications.
REMALY, MARK DONALD is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This busiest examiner pending count represents 1 of the 2 pending office actions. Since there are 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the prosecution strategy must account for different examiner preferences and art unit standards across the portfolio. The company does not have a primary point of contact at the patent office, as the workload is divided between the identified examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| REMALY, MARK DONALD | 1 | 70.5% | +15.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18054062 | ULTRASOUND DEVICE FOR VULVOVAGINAL REJUVENATION | REMALY, MARK DONALD | 99d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18054062 | ULTRASOUND DEVICE FOR VULVOVAGINAL REJUVENATION | REMALY, MARK DONALD | 3797 | §103 | Final Rejection | 99d overdue | Pending | Nov 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial