Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Maersk A/S

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Maersk A/S currently maintains 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split among 3 distinct examiners. The portfolio is distributed across 3 distinct art units. ZEROUAL, OMAR is identified as the busiest examiner. This examiner is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. The data shows a one-to-one ratio between 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners.

This indicates that no examiner is handling multiple cases for the company. The presence in 3 distinct art units suggests that the 3 pending office actions involve different technical specialties within the broader Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. ZEROUAL, OMAR, while listed as the busiest, only handles 1 busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners should note that the workload is perfectly distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZEROUAL, OMAR 1 33.5% +39.7%
ALLEN, JEFFREY R 1 48.1% +26.7%
MA, LISA 1 47.7% +44.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18262084 A METHOD FOR MODIFYING BOOKING DATA FOR A SHIPPING SYSTEM AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE MA, LISA 4d overdue
19161021 A METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE TURN TIME OF A CONTAINER AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE ZEROUAL, OMAR —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18262084 A METHOD FOR MODIFYING BOOKING DATA FOR A SHIPPING SYSTEM AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE MA, LISA 4d overdue
19161021 A METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE TURN TIME OF A CONTAINER AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE ZEROUAL, OMAR —
19053057 CONTAINER ASSEMBLY ALLEN, JEFFREY R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3629 1
3733 1
3628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19161021 A METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE TURN TIME OF A CONTAINER AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE ZEROUAL, OMAR 3629 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 29, 2025
19053057 CONTAINER ASSEMBLY ALLEN, JEFFREY R 3733 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 13, 2025
18262084 A METHOD FOR MODIFYING BOOKING DATA FOR A SHIPPING SYSTEM AND RELATED ELECTRONIC DEVICE MA, LISA 3628 §101 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2023

Managing Maersk A/S's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month