Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 1 | 55.7% | +24.0% |
| MOORE, DEVON TYLEN | 1 | 47.8% | +30.9% |
| WEST, PAUL M | 1 | 84.2% | +13.8% |
| ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M | 1 | 68.1% | +37.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18357871 | TRANSFER LINE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE TIGHTNESS | WEST, PAUL M | 104d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18424807 | CRYOGENIC TANK DEVICE WITH A BOIL-OFF MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 105d overdue |
| 18357871 | TRANSFER LINE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE TIGHTNESS | WEST, PAUL M | 104d overdue |
| 18411377 | Cryogenic tank comprising a withdrawal device | MOORE, DEVON TYLEN | 26d overdue |
| 18307056 | CRYOGENIC TANK | ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3763 | 2 |
| 3798 | 1 |
| 2855 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18424807 | CRYOGENIC TANK DEVICE WITH A BOIL-OFF MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | RAYMOND, KEITH MICHAEL | 3798 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 105d overdue | Pending | Jan 28, 2024 |
| 18411377 | Cryogenic tank comprising a withdrawal device | MOORE, DEVON TYLEN | 3763 | §103 | Final Rejection | 26d overdue | Pending | Jan 12, 2024 |
| 18357871 | TRANSFER LINE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE TIGHTNESS | WEST, PAUL M | 2855 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 104d overdue | Pending | Jul 24, 2023 |
| 18307056 | CRYOGENIC TANK | ADENIJI, IBRAHIM M | 3763 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Apr 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial