Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Magnum Transaction Sub LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, NEWTON, CHAD A, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused prosecution path for this application. This environment allows for a dedicated approach to the requirements of the single art unit involved.
The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner indicates a very specific point of engagement with the patent office. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the feedback from NEWTON, CHAD A within the 1 distinct art unit. This concentrated activity allows for a dedicated approach to resolving the single pending matter in the portfolio. The alignment of 1 examiner and 1 art unit for the 1 pending action simplifies the management of the company's active patent interests.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEWTON, CHAD A | 1 | 37.6% | +23.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18990262 | Retrieval-Augmented Synthetic Test Claim Generation | NEWTON, CHAD A | 38d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18990262 | Retrieval-Augmented Synthetic Test Claim Generation | NEWTON, CHAD A | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18990262 | Retrieval-Augmented Synthetic Test Claim Generation | NEWTON, CHAD A | 3681 | §101§102 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial