Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Majesty Holdings Co. Ltd. is currently prosecuting applications in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio contains 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, indicating that each examiner is handling a unique matter. The prosecution spans 2 distinct art units, suggesting some technological breadth within the mechanical engineering sector.
PANCHOLI, VISHAL J is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. This means the workload is evenly split, as each of the 3 distinct examiners manages 1 pending office action. The use of multiple examiners across 2 distinct art units provides a diverse set of perspectives on the company's patentability. For practitioners, this distribution implies that strategies may need to be tailored to multiple examiners even within a relatively small number of pending actions. The 3 pending office actions represent the current total volume of active challenges for the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | 1 | 72.8% | +25.3% |
| SEIF, DARIUSH | 1 | 70.5% | +6.2% |
| CARROLL, JEREMY W | 1 | 74.8% | +12.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18832505 | ALL-PLASTIC SINGLE-MATERIAL PRESS PUMP | CARROLL, JEREMY W | 9d overdue |
| 18868702 | LENGTHENED ALL-PLASTIC SELF-LOCKING PUMP | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18832505 | ALL-PLASTIC SINGLE-MATERIAL PRESS PUMP | CARROLL, JEREMY W | 9d overdue |
| 18868702 | LENGTHENED ALL-PLASTIC SELF-LOCKING PUMP | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 2 |
| 3731 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18868702 | LENGTHENED ALL-PLASTIC SELF-LOCKING PUMP | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | 3754 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 22, 2024 |
| 18862155 | ALL-PLASTIC FOAM PUMP STRUCTURE | SEIF, DARIUSH | 3731 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 31, 2024 |
| 18832505 | ALL-PLASTIC SINGLE-MATERIAL PRESS PUMP | CARROLL, JEREMY W | 3754 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Jul 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial