Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mamalibra Inc. D/B/A Lybbie has 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, showing a fragmented prosecution landscape despite the small number of active cases. The company is interacting with distinct examiners, meaning each pending matter is under the review of a different official. This distribution requires the applicant to manage separate examiner relationships and different art unit environments simultaneously.
HAMILTON, MATTHEW L is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action. Because there are distinct examiners for the active cases, the workload is perfectly distributed across the available staff. The involvement of distinct art units suggests that the underlying technologies may fall into different specialized sub-groups within the mechanical systems field. This spread means that even with a small portfolio, the company cannot rely on a single point of contact at the patent office. Each pending matter will likely follow its own unique timeline and examiner logic.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIS, AMELIE R | 1 | 65.0% | +33.4% |
| HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | 1 | 53.5% | +61.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19073341 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF BREAST MILK SUPPLY USING A WEARABLE OPTICAL SENSOR | DAVIS, AMELIE R | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19073341 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF BREAST MILK SUPPLY USING A WEARABLE OPTICAL SENSOR | DAVIS, AMELIE R | 13d |
| 19073350 | WEARABLE OPTICAL SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MONITORING BREAST MILK SUPPLY AND GENERATING DATA-DRIVEN INSIGHTS | HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3798 | 1 |
| 3682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19073341 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF BREAST MILK SUPPLY USING A WEARABLE OPTICAL SENSOR | DAVIS, AMELIE R | 3798 | §101§102§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
| 19073350 | WEARABLE OPTICAL SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MONITORING BREAST MILK SUPPLY AND GENERATING DATA-DRIVEN INSIGHTS | HAMILTON, MATTHEW L | 3682 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial