Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mamey Brands 1 LLC has 1 pending office action currently active. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN. No technology area is specified in the data for this portfolio, which may suggest a highly specific or uncategorized filing.
STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total pending workload for the company. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which is a unique characteristic of this profile's current prosecution status.
Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN to resolve the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the prosecution is highly concentrated. The outcome of this single matter will determine the immediate progress of the Mamey Brands 1 LLC portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | 1 | 39.2% | +35.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19018812 | PICKLEBALL PADDLE DAMPENING INSERT | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19018812 | PICKLEBALL PADDLE DAMPENING INSERT | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19018812 | PICKLEBALL PADDLE DAMPENING INSERT | STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 13, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial