Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mane Fencing Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mane Fencing Pty Ltd. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This configuration shows a focused engagement with the USPTO, with all current prosecution activity concentrated in one specific technical and administrative channel. The lack of diversity in examiners and art units simplifies the administrative overhead of tracking the company's intellectual property within this technology area.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KWIECINSKI, RYAN D, who is handling 1 pending office action. As there is only a limited number of pending actions in the entire portfolio, KWIECINSKI, RYAN D is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's applications. This creates a direct line of communication between the applicant and the examiner, where the prosecution strategy is entirely centered on the feedback and requirements of this one individual. Practitioners can dedicate their resources to understanding the unique preferences of this examiner.

The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the pending work is confined to a specific sub-sector of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution can be tailored to the specific culture and guidelines of this unit. There is no need to manage multiple examiner personalities or different art unit standards, making the current prosecution process streamlined. This focused approach allows for a consistent and efficient strategy in seeking patent protection for the company's current innovation.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 1 68.2% +19.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18275928 TEMPORARY BUILDING EDGE SAFETY SCREEN SUPPORT KWIECINSKI, RYAN D —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18275928 TEMPORARY BUILDING EDGE SAFETY SCREEN SUPPORT KWIECINSKI, RYAN D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3635 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18275928 TEMPORARY BUILDING EDGE SAFETY SCREEN SUPPORT KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 3635 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 04, 2023

Managing Mane Fencing Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mane Fencing Pty Ltd. have?

Mane Fencing Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mane Fencing Pty Ltd. applications?

Ryan D Kwiecinski has the most, with 1 of Mane Fencing Pty Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Mane Fencing Pty Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month