Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Manroland Goss Web Systems GmbH manages a company patent portfolio with 2 pending office actions. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This creates a high level of concentration for the company's current prosecution efforts at the USPTO.
The busiest examiner, DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP, is responsible for 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. This means DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP is handling all of the 2 pending office actions currently active for the portfolio. There are 0 distinct art units recorded for this portfolio, indicating that the filings are not spread across multiple departments.
For a practitioner, the presence of 2 pending office actions under 1 distinct examiner means that a 1 individual's decisions will have a significant impact on the portfolio. DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP is the sole point of contact for both active cases. The fact that there are 0 distinct art units suggests a very focused technical scope. This allows the practitioner to develop a consistent strategy across both of the 2 pending office actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP | 1 | 60.3% | +16.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18949433 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING DATA OF A PRINTING MACHINE | DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18949433 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING DATA OF A PRINTING MACHINE | DHINGRA, PAWANDEEP | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial