Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mapkure LLC

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mapkure LLC has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, reflecting a distributed prosecution across different examination groups. This lack of examiner concentration means that the company's prosecution results are subject to the individual discretion of two different officials.

The 2 distinct art units involved suggest that the company's medical innovations are being reviewed by different specialized groups. This variety requires a case-by-case approach to prosecution rather than a single unified strategy. With 2 distinct examiners involved, practitioners should expect to navigate two different examination styles across the 2 distinct art units. This distribution helps mitigate the risk that a single examiner's negative trend could impact the entire pending portfolio.

Because BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA and the other distinct examiner each have only 1 pending office action, the workload is evenly spread. This balance is a key feature of the company's current prosecution profile in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the technology being prosecuted is diverse enough to be routed to different technical groups at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA 1 27.4% +35.0%
CORNET, JEAN P 1 41.9% +47.2%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18487237 COMBINATION FOR USE IN TREATING CANCERS CORNET, JEAN P 23d overdue
18966838 Methods of Treating Cancer With a B-RAF Inhibitor BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18487237 COMBINATION FOR USE IN TREATING CANCERS CORNET, JEAN P 23d overdue
18966838 Methods of Treating Cancer With a B-RAF Inhibitor BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3786 1
1628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18966838 Methods of Treating Cancer With a B-RAF Inhibitor BREDEFELD, RACHAEL EVA 3786 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18487237 COMBINATION FOR USE IN TREATING CANCERS CORNET, JEAN P 1628 §103§112Other Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Oct 16, 2023

Managing Mapkure LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mapkure LLC have?

Mapkure LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mapkure LLC applications?

Rachael Eva Bredefeld has the most, with 1 of Mapkure LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Mapkure LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month