Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Marama Labs Limited currently manages a patent portfolio focused on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The company has 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This singular focus indicates that the company's current prosecution activity is limited to a very specific technical inquiry. The action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specialized classification for the underlying invention.
AYUB, HINA F is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing the 1 busiest examiner pending action. This means that the entire pending workload for Marama Labs Limited is concentrated under a single individual. Such a high degree of concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there is only one examiner's style and history to analyze. The 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit provide a clear and direct path for prosecution.
For practitioners, the presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action allows for a highly targeted strategy. There is no need to coordinate across different art units or adapt to multiple examiner preferences. The prosecution effort is entirely focused on the interaction with AYUB, HINA F within that single art unit. This lack of complexity ensures that the pending office action receives dedicated strategic attention.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AYUB, HINA F | 1 | 85.0% | +17.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19108572 | INTEGRATING CAVITY DEVICE FOR VOLUME INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENTS | AYUB, HINA F | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19108572 | INTEGRATING CAVITY DEVICE FOR VOLUME INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENTS | AYUB, HINA F | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2877 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19108572 | INTEGRATING CAVITY DEVICE FOR VOLUME INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENTS | AYUB, HINA F | 2877 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMarama Labs Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Hina F Ayub has the most, with 1 of Marama Labs Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
