Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Marc-Hamid Elsen

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Marc-Hamid Elsen currently manages a patent portfolio focused on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The portfolio shows a concentrated prosecution footprint with 1 pending office action distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a specific point of focus for current USPTO interactions.

EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. This concentration suggests that the outcome of this matter will define the immediate progress of the company's intellectual property strategy in this technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 1 62.7% +21.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16348971 LOAF PAN EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16348971 LOAF PAN EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
16348971 LOAF PAN EVANGELISTA, THEODORE JUSTINE 3761 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 19, 2019

Managing Marc-Hamid Elsen's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Marc-Hamid Elsen have?

Marc-Hamid Elsen has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Marc-Hamid Elsen applications?

Theodore Justine Evangelista has the most, with 1 of Marc-Hamid Elsen's pending office actions.

What technology area are Marc-Hamid Elsen's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month