Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Marel Poultry B V

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 1 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Marel Poultry B V currently has 4 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. While there are 4 distinct examiners involved, all of them are located within the same 1 distinct art unit. This concentration in a single art unit indicates a highly specialized technical focus for the company's current prosecution efforts. Practitioners should note that while the examiners are different, they operate under the same unit-level guidelines and technical standards in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.

PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because each of the 4 pending office actions is assigned to a different official, no single examiner has a dominant influence over the portfolio. However, the fact that all 4 distinct examiners are within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's applications are technically related. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination culture of this 1 distinct art unit while managing the individual preferences of the 4 distinct examiners. This structure allows for a centralized technical dialogue with the patent office despite the variety of examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS 1 87.4% +5.9%
DEVINE, MOLLY K 1 67.1% +32.0%
PARSLEY, DAVID J 1 54.1% +28.7%
NGUYEN, SON T 1 28.9% +16.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16345841 POULTRY CONTAINER COVER, POULTRY CONTAINER, AND POULTRY CONTAINER ASSEMBLY FOR HOLDING LIVE POULTRY NGUYEN, SON T 48d
19113677 PRE-EVISCERATION DEVICE PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS —
18652019 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING POULTRY SLAUGHTER PRODUCTS DEVINE, MOLLY K —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253670 METHOD FOR PROCESSING AND BATCHING FOOD ITEMS PARSLEY, DAVID J 31d overdue
16345841 POULTRY CONTAINER COVER, POULTRY CONTAINER, AND POULTRY CONTAINER ASSEMBLY FOR HOLDING LIVE POULTRY NGUYEN, SON T 48d
18652019 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING POULTRY SLAUGHTER PRODUCTS DEVINE, MOLLY K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3643 4

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19113677 PRE-EVISCERATION DEVICE PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS 3643 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2025
18652019 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSPECTING POULTRY SLAUGHTER PRODUCTS DEVINE, MOLLY K 3643 §102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024
18253670 METHOD FOR PROCESSING AND BATCHING FOOD ITEMS PARSLEY, DAVID J 3643 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue Pending May 19, 2023
16345841 POULTRY CONTAINER COVER, POULTRY CONTAINER, AND POULTRY CONTAINER ASSEMBLY FOR HOLDING LIVE POULTRY NGUYEN, SON T 3643 §103 Non-Final OA 48d Pending Apr 29, 2019

Managing Marel Poultry B V's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Marel Poultry B V have?

Marel Poultry B V has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Marel Poultry B V applications?

Richard Thomas Price Jr. has the most, with 1 of Marel Poultry B V's pending office actions.

What technology area are Marel Poultry B V's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month