Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Marine Power Systems Limited

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Marine Power Systems Limited has 3 pending office actions in its patent portfolio, which is categorized under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners. The prosecution is occurring across 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's technology spans multiple sub-categories within its primary field. The use of 2 distinct art units within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area means that practitioners must coordinate across two different technical groups.

The busiest examiner for the company is ANDERSON, AMBER R, who is currently responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 pending actions and 3 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly split, with each examiner managing 1 action. This indicates that ANDERSON, AMBER R is one of three officials currently reviewing the company's applications. The 3 to 3 ratio of pending actions to examiners ensures that each application is being handled by a different individual. This distribution provides a variety of examiner perspectives on the company's intellectual property.

Practitioners should be prepared to manage 3 different examiner relationships while navigating the specific standards of 2 art units. This profile represents a balanced prosecution environment where individual examiner attention is maintained across multiple technical departments. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations touch upon different sub-specialties within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. This data provides a baseline for future filings, as any expansion in the portfolio will likely introduce new examiners or art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ANDERSON, AMBER R 1 32.6% +34.0%
PAULSON, SHEETAL R. 1 39.1% +16.4%
BURGESS, MARC R 1 33.9% +24.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18463688 RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM WITH OPTIMISED ASSEMBLY BURGESS, MARC R 11d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18463688 RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM WITH OPTIMISED ASSEMBLY BURGESS, MARC R 11d overdue
18830159 RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM ASSEMBLY KIT AND METHOD ANDERSON, AMBER R —
18637137 RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM MOUNTING APPARATUS AND BUOYANT PLATFORM PAULSON, SHEETAL R. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3615 2
3678 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18830159 RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM ASSEMBLY KIT AND METHOD ANDERSON, AMBER R 3678 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18637137 RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM MOUNTING APPARATUS AND BUOYANT PLATFORM PAULSON, SHEETAL R. 3615 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18463688 RENEWABLE ENERGY PLATFORM WITH OPTIMISED ASSEMBLY BURGESS, MARC R 3615 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Sep 08, 2023

Managing Marine Power Systems Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month