Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd. is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio currently has 2 pending office actions. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing a diversified examination process for the company's chemical and biological filings. This distribution indicates that the company's applications are being reviewed by different specialized sections of the USPTO.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents a portion of the 2 pending office actions currently on file. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's technology is being evaluated under different specialized criteria. For practitioners, this requires a prosecution strategy that can adapt to the specific requirements of each art unit while managing the interactions with the 2 distinct examiners involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1 72.7% +18.2%
BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 1 80.6% +27.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263812 METHOD FOR PRODUCING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER, AND METHOD FOR REFINING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 15d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18691966 METHOD FOR PRODUCING VINYLPHOSPHONIC ACID MONOESTER CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263812 METHOD FOR PRODUCING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER, AND METHOD FOR REFINING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 15d
18691966 METHOD FOR PRODUCING VINYLPHOSPHONIC ACID MONOESTER CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1625 1
1692 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18691966 METHOD FOR PRODUCING VINYLPHOSPHONIC ACID MONOESTER CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S 1625 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2024
18263812 METHOD FOR PRODUCING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER, AND METHOD FOR REFINING (2-METHOXYETHYL) VINYL ETHER BAHTA, MEDHANIT W 1692 §103 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Aug 01, 2023

Managing Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd. have?

Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd. applications?

Nizal S Chandrakumar has the most, with 1 of Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Maruzen Petrochemical Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month