Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEWITT II, CALVIN L | 1 | 1.5% | +6.3% |
| BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 1 | 41.6% | +54.0% |
| LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 1 | 65.6% | +23.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18929728 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD,AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | HEWITT II, CALVIN L | 147d overdue |
| 17855186 | APPARATUS, A METHOD, AND A NONVOLATILE STORAGE MEDIUM | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 87d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17855186 | APPARATUS, A METHOD, AND A NONVOLATILE STORAGE MEDIUM | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 87d overdue |
| 18926616 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 10d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 4100 | 1 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18929728 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD,AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | HEWITT II, CALVIN L | 4100 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 147d overdue | Pending | Oct 29, 2024 |
| 18926616 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND A NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | BROCKINGTON III, WILLIAM S | 3623 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | Oct 25, 2024 |
| 17855186 | APPARATUS, A METHOD, AND A NONVOLATILE STORAGE MEDIUM | LEMIEUX, JESSICA | 3626 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 87d overdue | Pending | Jun 30, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial