Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mativ Holdings Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Mativ Holdings Inc. currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, showing a range of chemical and material innovations. This spread indicates that the company's portfolio is being reviewed by multiple specialized groups at the patent office. The presence of 5 pending office actions reflects a significant volume of active prosecution.

The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 5 pending office actions is being handled by a different individual. CALANDRA, ANTHONY J is identified as the busiest examiner, though he only holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. This suggests an even distribution of work across the examiner pool. No single examiner holds a majority of the pending cases.

With 5 pending office actions and 5 distinct examiners, the company must manage 5 separate legal dialogues simultaneously. The use of 3 distinct art units requires familiarity with different technical examination standards within the Chemistry & Materials field. Practitioners should be prepared for a variety of examiner styles, as CALANDRA, ANTHONY J is only 1 of 5 individuals influencing the portfolio's progress. This distribution requires a versatile approach to patent prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (60%)
Double-patenting only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

5
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CALANDRA, ANTHONY J 1 62.8% +18.7%
YAARY, ERIC 1 73.8% +3.3%
KESSIE, JENNIFER A 1 64.9% +20.3%
PHAM, VU PHI 1 46.2% +17.1%
CULBERT, COURTNEY GUENTHER 1 26.9% +8.2%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18116127 Process for Applying Additives To Aerosol Generating Substrates and Products Made Therefrom KESSIE, JENNIFER A —
17684054 High Strength Wrapping Material Containing Extracted Tobacco CULBERT, COURTNEY GUENTHER —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17748895 Process For Incorporating Additives Into Aerosol-Producing Substrates and Products Made Therefrom PHAM, VU PHI 29d
18676879 POROUS, LOW OPACITY PAPER CALANDRA, ANTHONY J —
18116127 Process for Applying Additives To Aerosol Generating Substrates and Products Made Therefrom KESSIE, JENNIFER A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1755 2
1747 2
1748 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18676879 POROUS, LOW OPACITY PAPER CALANDRA, ANTHONY J 1748 DP Final Rejection — Pending May 29, 2024
18318271 Filter For Smoking or Vaping Article Comprising a Smooth Paper YAARY, ERIC 1755 §103 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending May 16, 2023
18116127 Process for Applying Additives To Aerosol Generating Substrates and Products Made Therefrom KESSIE, JENNIFER A 1747 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 01, 2023
17748895 Process For Incorporating Additives Into Aerosol-Producing Substrates and Products Made Therefrom PHAM, VU PHI 1755 §103 Non-Final OA 29d Pending May 19, 2022
17684054 High Strength Wrapping Material Containing Extracted Tobacco CULBERT, COURTNEY GUENTHER 1747 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2022

Managing Mativ Holdings Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month