Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Matrixcross Inc. currently oversees 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, meaning each case has a unique reviewer. The portfolio is split across 2 distinct art units, indicating that even with a small number of actions, the technical subject matter is varied. This distribution suggests that the company's innovations fall into different specialized categories at the patent office.
The busiest examiner, NGUYEN, TIEN C, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. With only 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is evenly distributed across the 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should be prepared to handle 2 different art units and 2 different examiners for these matters. The data reflects a portfolio that is both administratively and technically dispersed despite its small size. The presence of 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending office actions highlights the diverse nature of the company's current mechanical and e-commerce filings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, TIEN C | 1 | 68.1% | +18.5% |
| WYSZYNSKI, AUBREY H | 1 | 89.5% | +12.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18640525 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PROTECTION DURING DYNAMIC ORDER MANAGEMENT | WYSZYNSKI, AUBREY H | 24d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18640525 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PROTECTION DURING DYNAMIC ORDER MANAGEMENT | WYSZYNSKI, AUBREY H | 24d overdue |
| 19175932 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PROTECTION DURING DYNAMIC ORDER MANAGEMENT | NGUYEN, TIEN C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3694 | 1 |
| 2434 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19175932 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PROTECTION DURING DYNAMIC ORDER MANAGEMENT | NGUYEN, TIEN C | 3694 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2025 |
| 18640525 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA PROTECTION DURING DYNAMIC ORDER MANAGEMENT | WYSZYNSKI, AUBREY H | 2434 | §101 | Final Rejection | 24d overdue | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial