Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Maximus Pedestal Systems Pty Ltd. is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, with 1 pending office action currently active. This action is assigned to TRIGGS, ANDREW J, who is the busiest examiner for the company. The portfolio's prosecution is highly centralized, featuring only a solitary distinct examiner and a lone distinct art unit. This specific administrative group represents the technical area where the company is currently focusing its patenting efforts. The active office action is the only case currently being managed by the company.
TRIGGS, ANDREW J is responsible for 1 pending office action, which accounts for the company's entire current workload at the USPTO. With only one distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, the company's prosecution strategy is focused on a solitary point of interaction. This active case defines the company's current progress in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. The absence of multiple examiners or art units means the company does not have to navigate different procedural styles across its active filings. This individual examiner will be the primary influence on the company's immediate intellectual property outcomes.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 1 | 66.7% | +27.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18679918 | ADAPTABLE PEDESTAL ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM FOR LEVELLING CONSTRUCTION SURFACES | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 6d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18679918 | ADAPTABLE PEDESTAL ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM FOR LEVELLING CONSTRUCTION SURFACES | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18679918 | ADAPTABLE PEDESTAL ASSEMBLY AND SYSTEM FOR LEVELLING CONSTRUCTION SURFACES | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 3635 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 6d | Pending | May 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial