Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mclaren Applied Technologies Limited has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 3 actions are being reviewed by multiple examiners. While the examiners are unique for each action, the portfolio is contained within 2 distinct art units, indicating some administrative overlap in the review process. This structure requires the company to navigate the specific requirements of multiple art units while managing individual examiner preferences.
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Given the distribution of matters, each official is responsible for 1 case. This arrangement means the company must maintain a consistent strategy across 2 different art units in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Practitioners should focus on the specific procedural history of each examiner to anticipate potential hurdles across the entire active portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| §112 only | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 1 | 34.9% | +40.2% |
| KREMER, MATTHEW | 1 | 43.6% | +52.2% |
| BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 1 | 36.0% | +30.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17754966 | Sensor Determination | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 121d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17754966 | Sensor Determination | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 121d overdue |
| 17754964 | Joint Axis Direction Estimation | KREMER, MATTHEW | 74d overdue |
| 17754983 | Joint Sensing | LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 2 |
| 3796 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17754983 | Joint Sensing | LOPEZ, SEVERO ANTON P | 3791 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 18, 2022 |
| 17754964 | Joint Axis Direction Estimation | KREMER, MATTHEW | 3791 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 74d overdue | Pending | Apr 18, 2022 |
| 17754966 | Sensor Determination | BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID | 3796 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 121d overdue | Pending | Apr 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialMclaren Applied Technologies Limited has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.
Severo Anton P Lopez has the most, with 1 of Mclaren Applied Technologies Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
