Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mediaseek Inc. maintains a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Current prosecution activity is limited to 1 pending office action. This specific matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, REDDY, SUNITA, who represents the entirety of the company's current examiner interaction. The data shows 1 distinct art unit is involved in the current workload. This suggests the pending intellectual property is specialized within a specific sub-discipline. REDDY, SUNITA serves as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending.
The prosecution strategy is currently dependent on a single point of contact at the USPTO. For a portfolio with 1 pending office action, the focus is on a single high-priority application rather than a broad array of filings. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit involved to navigate this single pending matter effectively. The lack of examiner diversity means there is no internal baseline for comparing examiner behavior within this portfolio. Consequently, the immediate success of the company's patent strategy depends on the interactions with this 1 distinct examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| REDDY, SUNITA | 1 | 67.3% | +61.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17822432 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READBLE STORAGE MEDIUM | REDDY, SUNITA | 77d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17822432 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READBLE STORAGE MEDIUM | REDDY, SUNITA | 77d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17822432 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READBLE STORAGE MEDIUM | REDDY, SUNITA | 3791 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 77d | Pending | Aug 26, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial