Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Medisieve Ltd. is active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 1 pending office action currently under review. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, indicating the technical discipline of the current effort. The presence of a single pending action suggests a focused approach to securing patent rights within this field. By operating within 1 distinct art unit, the company can focus its resources on the specific examination criteria prevalent in that technical area.
The prosecution of this portfolio is overseen by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the company's patent office communications. NORRIS, CLAIRE A is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. As this examiner holds the entirety of the company's current pending workload, the success of their immediate patent strategy is tied to the resolution of this single matter. The company must tailor its response to the 1 pending office action to meet the specific expectations of this examiner in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NORRIS, CLAIRE A | 1 | 65.8% | +28.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643059 | MAGNETIC FILTER APPARATUS AND METHOD | NORRIS, CLAIRE A | 60d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643059 | MAGNETIC FILTER APPARATUS AND METHOD | NORRIS, CLAIRE A | 60d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1779 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18643059 | MAGNETIC FILTER APPARATUS AND METHOD | NORRIS, CLAIRE A | 1779 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 60d overdue | Pending | Apr 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial