Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Meneta Holding A/S currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This outstanding action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution focus at this stage. SAHNI, VISHAL R is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the current legal challenges are localized within a specific regulatory framework. Practitioners should note that SAHNI, VISHAL R handles the entirety of the pending workload, as evidenced by the 1 busiest examiner pending count. This alignment between the total pending workload and the busiest examiner's load simplifies the coordination required for response strategies. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the portfolio's immediate outcomes depend on a single point of interaction within the patent office. This concentration allows for a very specific focus on the examiner's requirements.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAHNI, VISHAL R | 1 | 75.4% | +18.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18517131 | LAYERED PRODUCT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SUCH LAYERED PRODUCT | SAHNI, VISHAL R | 42d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3616 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18517131 | LAYERED PRODUCT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SUCH LAYERED PRODUCT | SAHNI, VISHAL R | 3616 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Nov 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial