Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Mersana Therapeutics Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Mersana Therapeutics Inc. is currently navigating the prosecution process within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio shows 3 pending office actions, indicating a moderate level of active engagement with the patent office. This activity is distributed across 3 distinct examiners, suggesting that the company's innovations touch upon various sub-specialties within the broader biotechnology field.

The prosecution is further divided among 3 distinct art units. This distribution implies that the patent applications may involve diverse technical implementations or regulatory categories. Practitioners should note that this variety requires managing relationships and expectations across multiple examination groups simultaneously to ensure consistent results across the portfolio.

GODDARD, LAURA B is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. While the workload is spread out, the presence of multiple examiners and art units highlights a lack of examiner concentration. This strategy may result in varied prosecution timelines and outcomes depending on the specific practices and historical tendencies of each assigned art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GODDARD, LAURA B 1 50.8% +13.6%
STOICA, ELLY GERALD 1 66.8% +22.6%
BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1 64.6% +19.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17289992 CYSTEINE ENGINEERED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES WITH PEPTIDE-CONTAINING LINKERS BUNNER, BRIDGET E 22d
18595834 B7H4-TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF GODDARD, LAURA B —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17289992 CYSTEINE ENGINEERED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES WITH PEPTIDE-CONTAINING LINKERS BUNNER, BRIDGET E 22d
18595834 B7H4-TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF GODDARD, LAURA B —
18319176 B7-H4-TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER STOICA, ELLY GERALD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1642 1
1614 1
1647 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18595834 B7H4-TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF GODDARD, LAURA B 1642 §101§103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2024
18319176 B7-H4-TARGETED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER STOICA, ELLY GERALD 1614 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 17, 2023
17289992 CYSTEINE ENGINEERED ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES WITH PEPTIDE-CONTAINING LINKERS BUNNER, BRIDGET E 1647 §103§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Apr 29, 2021

Managing Mersana Therapeutics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Mersana Therapeutics Inc. have?

Mersana Therapeutics Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Mersana Therapeutics Inc. applications?

Laura B Goddard has the most, with 1 of Mersana Therapeutics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Mersana Therapeutics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month