Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Metalogenia Research & Technologies S L

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Metalogenia Research & Technologies S L has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners but are both within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a consistent technical classification for the pending matters. For the applicant, the use of 1 distinct art unit means that the examination standards and prior art references are likely to be similar across the 2 pending office actions, even though they are being reviewed by different individuals.

BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This represents 1 of the 2 total pending office actions. The presence of 2 distinct examiners in 1 distinct art unit means the company must address the specific requirements of two different reviewers within the same technical field. Practitioners should be prepared for potential differences in examiner style while leveraging the shared technical context of the 1 distinct art unit. Managing 2 pending office actions in this manner requires a balanced approach to ensure that responses are tailored to each of the 2 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY 1 72.0% +22.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842854 PINLESS SHROUDS FOR EARTH MOVING MACHINES BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18842854 PINLESS SHROUDS FOR EARTH MOVING MACHINES BREGEL, EVAN ANTHONY — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024

Managing Metalogenia Research & Technologies S L's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month