Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Mfgl Technology LLC currently has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus for the company's current matters.
The busiest examiner for the company is KANG, EDWIN G, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, this examiner handles all of the company's current workload. This creates a single point of interaction between the company and the patent office.
The presence of 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector indicates a targeted approach to patenting. KANG, EDWIN G manages this 1 pending action within the 1 distinct art unit involved. This streamlined prosecution profile suggests that the company's current legal efforts are focused on a single application and ensures direct oversight.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KANG, EDWIN G | 1 | 64.3% | +66.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18863789 | JET PROPULSION UTILIZING CRYOGENIC FUEL | KANG, EDWIN G | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18863789 | JET PROPULSION UTILIZING CRYOGENIC FUEL | KANG, EDWIN G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3741 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18863789 | JET PROPULSION UTILIZING CRYOGENIC FUEL | KANG, EDWIN G | 3741 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial