Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Michigan Technological University

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Michigan Technological University has 4 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters are assigned to 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, so each action has a separate examiner and examination-group context. Counsel should maintain consistent treatment of related research concepts while tailoring claim and evidence analysis to each individual prosecution record.

WONG, EDNA is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The reported docket contains no examiner concentration beyond that assignment. A distributed review process is appropriate, with separate responses addressing the chemical or materials issues raised in each action and centralized oversight of terminology and amendment strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WONG, EDNA 1 58.4% -19.7%
LEE, CRYSTAL J 1 82.2% +21.4%
EVANS, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 1 60.9% +64.3%
FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M 1 45.6% +35.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18842106 CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND UTILIZATION AS A CLEAN FEEDSTOCK WONG, EDNA 85d overdue
18715978 SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF CARBON DIOXIDE, NOx and SOx USING SINGLE STAGE ABSORPTION COLUMN AND RELATED METHODS LEE, CRYSTAL J —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17637018 HIGH-BRIGHTNESS FLUOROPHORES FOR QUANTIFICATION AND PHENOTYPING OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES EVANS, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 8d overdue
18715978 SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF CARBON DIOXIDE, NOx and SOx USING SINGLE STAGE ABSORPTION COLUMN AND RELATED METHODS LEE, CRYSTAL J —
17615425 HIGH-BRIGHTNESS NANODOT FLUOROPHORES BY COVALENT FUNCTIONALIZATION FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1795 1
1738 1
1677 1
1758 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18842106 CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND UTILIZATION AS A CLEAN FEEDSTOCK WONG, EDNA 1795 §103§112 Final Rejection 85d overdue Pending Aug 28, 2024
18715978 SIMULTANEOUS REMOVAL OF CARBON DIOXIDE, NOx and SOx USING SINGLE STAGE ABSORPTION COLUMN AND RELATED METHODS LEE, CRYSTAL J 1738 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 03, 2024
17637018 HIGH-BRIGHTNESS FLUOROPHORES FOR QUANTIFICATION AND PHENOTYPING OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES EVANS, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 1677 §103Other Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Feb 21, 2022
17615425 HIGH-BRIGHTNESS NANODOT FLUOROPHORES BY COVALENT FUNCTIONALIZATION FRITCHMAN, REBECCA M 1758 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 30, 2021

Managing Michigan Technological University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Michigan Technological University have?

Michigan Technological University has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Michigan Technological University applications?

Edna Wong has the most, with 1 of Michigan Technological University's pending office actions.

What technology area are Michigan Technological University's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month